Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Àΰø¸Å½ÄÄ¡ÀÇ Æò°¡¸¦ À§ÇÑ Ä¡ÁÖÁö¼ö°£ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è

Interrelationship between periodontal parameters for the evaluation of clinically stable dental implants

´ëÇÑÄ¡ÁÖ°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 28±Ç 1È£ p.1 ~ 16
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èµ¿È¯/Dong Hwan Kim ¹ÚÁغÀ/À̸¸¼·/±Ç¿µÇõ/ÇãÀÍ/Joon-Bong Park/Man-Sup Lee/Young-Hyuk Kwon/Yeek Herr

Abstract

ÀÚ¿¬Ä¡ÀÇ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â Ä¡ÁÖÁö¼ö°£ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ Á¤¸³µÇ¾î º´ÀûÀÎ »óÅ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áø´Ü°ú ±×¿¡
µû¸¥ Ä¡·á¹æ¹ýÀ» °áÁ¤Çϴµ¥ ¸¹Àº Á¤º¸¸¦ Á¦°øÇϳª, Àΰø¸Å½ÄÄ¡¿¡¼­´Â ¾ÆÁ÷ ³í¶õÀÇ ¿©Áö°¡
¸¹´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ ÀÓ»óÀûÀ¸·Î ¾ÈÁ¤È­µÇ¾î ±â´ÉÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â Àΰø¸Å½ÄÄ¡¿¡¼­ Ä¡ÁÖÁö¼ö°£ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¿¡
°üÇÏ¿© ¿¬±¸ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
ÃÑ 43¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ(Æò±Õ 44. 7¼¼)¿¡ ½Ä¸³µÈ 178°³ÀÇ Àΰø¸Å½ÄÄ¡¸¦ ¿¬±¸¿¡ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀΰøÄ¡
¾Æ¸Å½Ä¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑ ÈÄ 1³â¿¡¼­ 6³âÀÌ °æ°úÇÑ Àΰø¸Å½ÄÄ¡¿¡¼­ »óºÎº¸Ã¶¹°À» Á¦°ÅÇÑ ÈÄ Ä¡ÅÂ
Áö¼ö, Ä¡Àº¿­±¸ÃâÇ÷Áö¼ö, °¢È­Á¡¸·Áö¼ö, Ä¡ÁÖ³¶±íÀÌ, Penotest values(PTVs) µîÀ» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿©
°¢°¢ÀÇ ºÐÆ÷»óȲ°ú »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
ÀÌ ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù.
1. Ä¡ÅÂÁö¼öÀÇ Æò±Õ°ªÀº 0.83¡¾0.82À̾ú´Ù.
2. Ä¡Àº¿­±¸ÃâÇ÷Áö¼öÀÇ Æò±Õ°ªÀº 1.04¡¾0.86À̾ú´Ù.
3. °¢È­Á¡¸·Áö¼öÀÇ Æò±Õ°ªÀº 2.47¡¾0.95À̾ú´Ù.
4. Ä¡ÁÖ³¶±íÀÌÀÇ Æò±Õ°ªÀº 3.12¡¾1.14 §®À̾ú´Ù
5. Penotest Values(PTVs)ÀÇ Æò±Õ°ªÀº -0.66¡¾4.28À̾ú´Ù.
6.Ä¡ÅÂÁö¼ö, Ä¡ÁÖ³¶±íÀÌ°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó Ä¡Àº¿­±¸ÃâÇ÷Áö¼ö´Â À¯ÀǼºÀÖ°Ô Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù
(P<0.01).
7 °¢È­Á¡¸·Áö¼ö°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó Ä¡Àº¿­±¸ÃâÇ÷Áö¼ö´Â À¯ÀǼºÀÖ°Ô °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù(P<0.01).
8. Ä¡Àº¿­±¸ÃâÇ÷Áö¼ö¿Í ¸Å½ÄÄ¡µ¿¿äµµ »çÀÌ¿¡¼­´Â À¯ÀǼºÀÖ´Â »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ ¹ß°ßÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø¾ú
´Ù (P>0.05).
9. Ä¡ÁÖ³¶±íÀÌ¿Í ¸Å½ÄÄ¡µ¿¿äµµ »çÀÌ¿¡¼­µµ À¯ÀǼºÀÖ´Â »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ ¹ß°ßÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø¾ú´Ù
(P)0.05).
10. Àΰø¸Å½ÄÄ¡ÀÇ Á÷°æ°ú ±æÀÌ°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ¸Å½ÄÄ¡µ¿¿äµµ´Â À¯ÀǼºÀÖ°Ô °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù
(P<0.01).
11, ÇϾǿ¡¼­ÀÇ ¸Å½ÄÄ¡µ¿¿äµµ°¡ »ó¾ÇÀÇ °æ¿ì¿Í ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© À¯ÀǼºÀÖ°Ô ÀÛ¾Ò´Ù(P(0.01).
°á·ÐÀûÀ¸·Î, Àΰø¸Å½ÄÄ¡¿¡¼­µµ ÀÚ¿¬Ä¡¿¡¼­¿Í µ¿ÀÏÇÑ ¾ç»óÀ¸·Î Ä¡Å°¡ ¸¹À»¼ö·Ï, ±×¸®°í Ä¡
ÁÖ³¶ ±íÀÌ°¡ ±íÀ»¼ö·Ï ¿°ÁõÀÇ ½Éµµ¿Í °ü·ÃÀÌ ±íÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù. ƯÈ÷, Àΰø¸Å½ÄÄ¡ÀÇ °æ
¿ì¿¡´Â °°Àº ¾çÀÇ Ä¡Å°¡ Á¸Àç½Ã¿¡ °¢È­Ä¡ÀºÀÌ ÃæºÐÈ÷ ÀÖ´Â ÂÊÀÌ ¿°Áõ¹ß»ýÀÌ ÀûÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î
³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
Ä¡ÁÖÁ¶Á÷¿¡ ¿°ÁõÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì, ÀÚ¿¬Ä¡¾Æ¿¡¼­´Â Ä¡¾ÆÀÇ µ¿¿äµµ°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ¾Ë
·ÁÁ® ÀÖÀ¸³ª, ÀÌ ½ÇÇèÀÇ Àΰø¸Å½ÄÄ¡¿¡¼­´Â À¯ÀǼºÀÖ´Â »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ ¹ß°ßÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ÀÓ»óÀû
À¸·Î ¾ÈÁ¤È­µÈ Àΰø¸Å½ÄóÀÇ µ¿¿äµµ´Â ¿°ÁõÁ¤µµ¿¡´Â Å«¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÞÁö ¾Ê°í Àΰø¸Å½ÄÄ¡ÀÇ Á÷°æ
°ú ±æÀÌ°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó °¨¼ÒÇÔÀ» º¸¿©ÁÖ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, Àΰø¸Å½ÄóÀÇ µ¿¿äµµ´Â »óÇϾǰñÀÇ
°ñÁú¿¡ µû¶ó Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ÀÖÀ½À» ¸íÈ®È÷ º¸¿©ÁÖ°í ÀÖ´Ù.

Conclusions
The purpose of this stuffy was to evaluate modified periodontal parameters applied for
dental implants and interrelationship between these parameters. In this stuffy 178 dental
implants were placed in 43 patients(mean 44.7 years) an4 the results were as follows.
1. Mean value of Modified Plaque Index(M-PI) was 0.83¡¾0.82.
2. Mean value of Modified Sulcus Bleeding Index(M-SBI) was 1.04¡¾0.86.
3. Mean value of Keratinized Mucosa Index(KMI) was 2.47¡¾0.95.
4. Mean value of Probing Depth(PD) was 3.12 ¡¾ 1.14 §®.
5. Mean value of Periotest Values(PTVs) was -0.66¡¾4.28.
6. M-SBI showed significant increase in higher M-PI and/or deeper PD (P<0.01).
7. M-SBI showed significant decrease in higher KMI(P<0.01).
8. There was no correlation between M-SBI and PTVs(P>0.05).
9. There was no correlation between PD and PTVs(P>0.05).
10. PTVs showed significant decrease in higher Diameter and/or Length of implant
fixture(P<0.01)
11. PTVs showed significantly low values in the mandible compared to the
maxilla(p<0.01).
In conclusion, sulcus bleeding around the dental Implant showed significant increase in
higher plaque accumulation and/or deeper probing depth. Despite similar amounts of
plaque accumulation, implants placed in keratinized mucosa showed significant more
decrease in sulcus bleeding tendency.
When inflammation was present in sulcular tissues, increased mobility was found in
natural teeth, butt no correlation was found in clinically stable implants of the present
study.
In clinically stable implants, there was the inverse correlation between PTVs and the
diameter/length of implant fixture, having no concern with pen-implant sulcus bleeding.
Moreover, Periotest values(PTVs) showed significantly low values in the mandible
compared to the maxilla, which may be due to the difference of bone quality.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI